This report is the latest in Carbon Tracker’s Flying Blind series, which focuses on the extent to which companies disclose their consideration of climate-related risks within financial statements, and auditors in their audit reports. It highlights jurisdictional differences in regulatory activity and apparent enforcement of existing standards that require consideration of the material financial impacts of climate and transition risks. It provides insights into how regulators can safeguard transparency in financial reporting, promote market integrity and financial stability.

Covering 97 companies across five key markets—Australia, the European Union (EU), Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US)—this report underscores the crucial role of regulators in driving high-quality financial statements – and audit reports – that investors, regulators and policymakers can rely on for decision making.

This report finds:

  • Evidence of, and transparency around, consideration of climate-related matters in financial statements and audit reports vary significantly across jurisdictions. This is despite the similarities in existing reporting requirements.
  • The EU and UK lead in transparency and disclosure quality, while Japan and the US lag. Australia sits in between. The relative positioning of these jurisdictions (refer Fig 2, p6) reflects the extent of regulatory activity and reinforces the link between reviews or enforcement and better practice.
  • Disclosure in audit reports across jurisdictions often lag those in financial statements, even in the EU which is a leader in company reporting and regulatory activity.
  • Regulators play a key role in monitoring and enforcing existing financial reporting and auditing standards that require companies and their auditors to assess the financial impacts of climate risk and the energy transition on financial statements. In some jurisdictions, their activities are falling short.